Back to Search
ISBN 9781974202607 is currently unpriced. Please contact us for pricing.
Available options are listed below:

Arleigh Burke destroyers: additional analysis and oversight required to support the Navy's future surface combatant plans: report to the Ranking

AUTHOR Office, U. S. Government Accountability
PUBLISHER Createspace Independent Publishing Platform (08/03/2017)
PRODUCT TYPE Paperback (Paperback)

Description
" After nearly a decade and almost $10 billion in development on Zumwalt class destroyers, the Navy changed its acquisition approach from procuring Zumwalts to restarting production of Arleigh Burke class destroyers (DDG 51) and building a new version, known as Flight III. As requested, GAO reviewed the Navy's plans for DDG 51 and missile defense capabilities by (1) evaluating how the Navy determined the most appropriate platform to meet surface combatant requirements; (2) identifying and analyzing differences in design, cost, and schedule of the restart ships compared with previous ships; and (3) assessing the feasibility of Navy plans for maturing and integrating new technologies and capabilities. GAO analyzed Navy and contractor documentation and interviewed Navy, contractor, and other officials. "
Show More
Product Format
Product Details
ISBN-13: 9781974202607
ISBN-10: 1974202607
Binding: Paperback or Softback (Trade Paperback (Us))
Content Language: English
More Product Details
Page Count: 70
Carton Quantity: 58
Product Dimensions: 8.50 x 0.14 x 11.02 inches
Weight: 0.41 pound(s)
Country of Origin: US
Subject Information
BISAC Categories
Reference | Research
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
publisher marketing
" After nearly a decade and almost $10 billion in development on Zumwalt class destroyers, the Navy changed its acquisition approach from procuring Zumwalts to restarting production of Arleigh Burke class destroyers (DDG 51) and building a new version, known as Flight III. As requested, GAO reviewed the Navy's plans for DDG 51 and missile defense capabilities by (1) evaluating how the Navy determined the most appropriate platform to meet surface combatant requirements; (2) identifying and analyzing differences in design, cost, and schedule of the restart ships compared with previous ships; and (3) assessing the feasibility of Navy plans for maturing and integrating new technologies and capabilities. GAO analyzed Navy and contractor documentation and interviewed Navy, contractor, and other officials. "
Show More
Paperback